Heresy syncroblog - An overview

nicpaton's picture

We had a rather (to use a new phrase of Matt Stone's) "pluriform" representation amongst the contributors, which is what was wanted. From measured Reformed exposition, to unbridled Gnosticism, from Emergent Chaos mongering to Evangelical Order management, from Explicit Patriarchy to The New Feminine Divine, a fairly wide range of views has come into view.

And although there were as few tentatively "guilty of heresy" charges, and gratuitous use of the newly in focus "H" and "O" words, the overall tenor was conversational, not judgemental. No-one resorted to mudslinging, and everyone was at pains to "express the hope that they hold". I salute all, those posting and those commenting!

OK that’s the feel good stuff out of the way: what were the criticisms?

Well, once again there was not a single female contributor, nor (from what I can remember) any female commenters. Nor any other cultural representation beyond the male, and the Eurocentric, (albeit a self-styled African variant). This is the blogosphere, technical, cerebral and wordy, but one would hope for a wider representation.

A strong POV came our way from Deacon Steve Hayes, who said

  • I was a bit disappointed that in this synchroblog so many seemed to simply accept … “orthodoxy” as being solely concerned with correct doctrinal expressions."

My reply to this was I was disappointed with the fact that many detractors of “heresy”, or upholders of "orthodoxy", saw no redemptive irony in its use. There was little acknowledgement of the creative edges of spirituality, and a generally rather defensive attitude towards various evangelical myths of Christianity.

Quotable notes and notable quotes:

  • If we tend to think of systematic theology as "orthodoxy", and then believe that our systematic theology grasps G-d fully, we've set up an ideology which the Bible would denounce as idolatrous.
  • What we have in evangelicalism is more often than not a lager mentality, the call to protect our doctrine at all costs.

So what about the current readership? What are your top quotes/notes from the synchroblog; what did you learn; what are you reservations?

Comments

envoy's picture

positive but lacking something

Nic,

I've loosely advertised this synchro in my circle. It's now abundantly clear that those who critique the emergings/emergents in face-to-face dialogue to others aren't happy to take that discussion online, or perhaps did not find enough in what we posted to engage with.

Overall this was quite a positive synchro. I'm amused at Aratus' election of the gender of Godde as his initial post. I'm looking forward to him engaging me on that issue on my blog on the gender of Godde. I must admit I'm disappointed that no women have stepped forward in this area. Perhaps that's why men lead the church and women, for the most part, don't.

Steve Hayes' distinguishing the Orthodox leg of the Church Universal from it's more perjorative use was good as was his critique of David Bosch.

I hoped for a more deliberate "coming out" of where people felt the emerging/emergent church was perceived as being heretical, but I guess we're the converted conversing with the converted.

Envoy

nicpaton's picture

con con con

Good observation envoy. It would be great if birds of unlike feather flocked together, but by and large that does not happen. So I suppose the range of views we have is not bad by any means.

I'd suggest, in my infuriatingly emergent way, that we are the converting conversing with the converting. Our bandwidth is something we should celebrate, however narrow it might be in the broader spectrum of things.

In the apophatic view (put that in your pipes and smoke it) evangelism is something we allow to be done to us, not the other way around. Synchrobog anyone?

 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
JUST KIDDING. Sheesh, you guys ...

Stray's picture

Comments on mine

Overall, I thought there was a lot of different takes on the subject although I was somewhat disappointed with the general lack of conversation.

I did have someone of the female gender comment on my post, and this is something she said which I thought was really interesting :

"The Jews say that every verse of Torah has 70 faces (70 possible interpretations) and they simply enjoy the process of wrangling and discussing whose interpretation is more plausible, simultaneously enjoying the ambiguity."

Definately an interesting thing to consider as we study the scriptures for ourselves.

www.ryanpeterwrites.com
"The Glory of God is man fully alive" - St Iraneaus

nicpaton's picture

excellant (or maybe even quite good)

Stray
Thanks for filling us in - that represents an important facet of Conversation, that it not necessarily be resolved, but that it builds (in my view) community in the doing.

Or, maybe it doesn't, but is only so much hot air.

Or, maybe it does, PLUS it develops an orthodoxy at the same time.

Or, [insert other 67 interpretations here]

Post new comment

Please solve the math problem above and type in the result. e.g. for 1+1, type 2.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <em> <b> <img> <i>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options