Attacks on emerging church in South Africa

Steve Hayes's picture

During the last month I've seen a couple of attacks on the "emerging church" by South African bloggers. I blogged about the specific attacks at The emerging menace in South Africa, so I won't repeat the specifics here.

I've read about or heard about attacks on "emerging church" in other places, and I've usually skipped them because they usually mention strings of names of people I've never heard of, or, if I have, whose views I'm not familiar with, so I have no way of knowing how accurate the criticisms are, and the critics rarely explain where they themselves are coming from.

The South African ones are different, however, because I've followed a fair bit of the conversation in forums like this one, and have met some of the participants in the "conversation" in person.

This gives a slightly different slant to what I mentioned in an earlier topic. In South Africa we have perhaps more opportunities to meet in person, and to learn a little more about each other's background, so that it seems to me that these critics should actually join the conversation, because I think (as I explained in the post on my blog) that some of their criticism is ill-informed and unclear.

So I think that the conversation should expand to include the critics, and take up some of the points that they seem to be concerned about, and perhaps gain greater clarity, and see if there are real disagreements, or just misunderstandings caused by misleading terminology.

For example, I would love to know if anyone in the "emerging church" actually expounds a "postmodernist ideology", and if so, what that ideology actually is.

If nothing else, you could go to the critics' blogs and comment.

Any takers?

Comments

envoy's picture

definately

I agree. It would be great if critics would converse a bit, entering into dialogue openly. It's a bit annoying when people are antagonistic from the start.

Envoy

Hmmm....

I agree Steve... although not holding my breath for antagonists to engage in reasonable conversation sans mud-slinging. I think all of us who might class ourselves as "Emergent" have arrived at this place through many years of questioning... many different experiences... much thought... much prayer... and certainly, much discussion with similar minded friends. I don't think any of us woke up one morning with a "Eureka!" kind of moment - or just "decided" one day - out of the blue - to be a part of Emergent. Because of this, I have my doubts that engaging the critics will produce any kind of positive outcome. Everyone will be vigorously trying to prove their own point and make their own arguments... (including myself - if I were in such a discussion)... and I cynically have to wonder how much actual 'listening' will take place.

I've given up trying to explain "emergent" to those who simply don't want to hear... and prefer to engage with like-minded souls who "get" it on a level far deeper than theology and religious idealisms. I doubt I could convert a critic... and I don't even think that I want to. The critic will need to walk his own path with God and with the Church... and eventually reach his own conclusions (or let his pastor reach them on his behalf).

But hey! Please prove me wrong! I'd just love to hear some stories of how a critic changed his mind after a long, detailed discussion... but - as I say - I'm not holding my breath.

attacks

Hi Steve, thanks for your comments. This is an important conversation and I would like to see it go further. It is my impression that the emerging church has arisen out of the failure of the "modern" church to practice authentic biblical Christianity. Like postmodernism's response to modernism, it is in many ways a reaction to what the Western church had (has) become with its consumerist approach, "Christendom" mindset, 'modern' values and practices, and failure to embrace a missional perspective toward our rapidly changing (and increasingly postmodern) world. Emerging churches tend to embrace values and practices that are attractive to the postmodern thinker, but that does not mean they are postmodern concerning underlying beliefs and espoused values. The emphasis on community, incarnational living, authenticity, experiential encounter with God, narrative, and missional engagement are, nonetheless, very attractive to postmoderns. Many critics incorrectly see the emerging church as either doing things differently or compromising biblical truth just to attract young people. We both know that this is not the heart of the movement. Though I have not come across much overt criticism, there are certainly issues that the movement will face as it seeks to live out biblical Christianity in today's world. Ironically, what is emerging today may be mainstream tomorrow. This is the history of the Church over the ages. Sadly, there will be those who go astray because they become isolated and lose sight of the biblical purpose of the Church of Jesus Christ. We must all be praying for new churches and movements as the apostle Paul did. Perhaps the most powerful way to help those who are critical of the emerging church is by practicing what Paul told Timothy in 1 Timothy 4:12 (NASB) "Let no one look down on your 'youthfulness', but rather in speech, conduct, love, faith and purity, show yourself an example of those who believe". Incarnational Christianity is very hard to gainsay. Many of those in the "modern" church have a non-biblical and rather enculturated view of what it means to be the 'Church'. Even concepts of "success"are often modernistic rather than biblical. Perhaps the Holy Spirit will empower our conversation in such a way that we can all learn and grow in God's purposes. Thanks again to everyone involved for your willingness to provide this forum.

Bless you,
Bert Watson

Steve Hayes's picture

Synchroblog on postmodernism and postmodernity

To tryo to get some discussion started on this, I've proposed a synchroblog on postmodernism and postmodernity next month. If it looks like taking off, I'll post more details here.

envoy's picture

synchro

I'd be keen to join you for the synchro.

Envoy

Steve Hayes's picture

Synchroblog

It seems that the topic I suggested wasn't popular with other synchrobloggers, and the topic they've opted for is "darkness and death", on 10 December.

Roger Saner's picture

Postmodern ideology

*sigh* Hello, postmodernism. Hello, you word, used to paint people either as "friends" or "foes." Hello, you seperator!

Those South Africans Christians who critique posmodernism, saying it's all about "the death of absolute truth," believe that postmoderns can't agree on meaning, since meaning becomes irrelevant when there are no absolutes. Interesting, then, that they've invented their own definition of postmodernism. I've yet to read a postmodern author/philosopher who believes in the death of absolute truth (invitation to those who think I'm wrong: simply cite someone). Actually, it was a modern philosopher who wrote about "The death of God"...and isn't it interesting that postmodernism is opening up a space for religion in the "secular" world once again (see chapter 2 in John Caputo's "On Religion" called "How the secular world became post-secular").

So, those who believe that postmodernism removes the possibility of absolute truth, please follow your own advice and do some research into the meaning of postmodernism. And since any discussion of postmodernism will lead to the concept of deconstruction (which is widely misunderstood as "de-struction"), a good place to start is to read John Caputo's "Deconstruction in a nutshell."

Steve, you asked if anyone expounds a "postmodernism ideology" - well, I don't know what that is! I do know that last century brought to rise something called "the critique of ideology" which was meant to finally crush religion as a valid intellectual option. But what happened is that critique got turned in upon itself, which opened a space, ironically, for religion. So I see postmodernism as good news!

envoy's picture

another good Caputo

Roger,

Radical Hermeneutics is likely the best exposition on deconstruction. It's a heavier read than "nutshell" though.

Caputo explores there the notions of "retrieval" and "repetition". We "deconstruct" current practice in order to "retrieve" the point of why we're doing what we do and then seek to "repeat" the original impetus in our context (having learnt from other expressions thereof).

I guess the older word is "reformation" - people in a previous era deconstructing in their own way during their own times.

Envoy

Steve Hayes's picture

Postmodernist ideology

Roger,

Thanks for that, and for taking up the challenge.

Since wrting that the descriptions of "postmodernist ideology" were vague, i have now found a better description and critique of postmodernism here.

Unfortunately, it criticises postmodernism from a modernist point of view, with modernist assumptions. But at least it gives a definition and a description.

And, as I said on my blog at Notes from underground: The emerging menace in South Africa, I've not noticed much "postmodern ideology" among emerging people I've encountered. Concern about mission and evangelism in the postmodern world, yes, but not "postmodernist ideology" as such.

nicpaton's picture

Threat? What Threat?

It feels like this:
- Fr David McGregor woke up on Oct 18th, got a skrik based on the Emergent Threat.
- Ran to his computer and wrote a post starting with the words "I am told that ..."
- Did a cut 'n paste job on Phillip Rosenthal's site http://emergingthreat.blogspot.com/2008/10/why-postmodernism-and-emerging-church.html, taking a wholesale chunk of Phillips alarmism onto his blog. [Phillip ;)]
- Today confesses to "just fishing in this particular pool, and hoping to arrive at some understanding... "
- Finally "bowing out of this particular conversation".

Fr David, I tried to post a reply to you but not being on Blogger, could not. See http://contact-online.blogspot.com/2008/10/why-postmodernism-and-emerging-church.html for that.

I know I sound a little cheeky above - its all in good spirit - and there is nothing wrong with investigating something, even momentarily. But I hardly feel that you have invested a lot of time in what makes up Emergence, and why it might be a Threat.

For what its worth, I deeply appreciate the Anglican Tradition, as well as the fact that you are 77 and still asking valid questions. I recently re-read Cannon FW Farrars "Mercy and Judgement" (1887) and found his Anglican Orthodoxy highly inspiring. Emergents who tend to be younger than you could well do with your maturity and experience as we face the unknown in this adventure of faith.

Don't bow out, keep talking to us, and we can all learn together.

If you get down to Cape Town, I would be delighted to have you over to talk music, modernity and post modernity. One or two sugars, Vicar?

Peter Veysie's picture

So good to be talking

Wow - I was out the loop for a while as I am finalising my proposal for my Doctorate on this very issue and so am excited to see great comment and good thinking. I would like to believe that we are an emergent generation of Christ followers in a postmodern world, trying as best as we can to be authentic and real. It all begins and ends with love and I do pray that the "church'","ecclesia", "people" would generate enough grace to be in conversation as opposed to a 'them' and 'us' situation. Our Lord is premodern, modern, postmodern, and post to the power of whatever modern. In all and through all, weakness,confusion, deception and of course life, breathe, hope.I would like to believe that it is all about meeting us where we are and moving us more into the likeness of Creator, Redeemer and Sustainer.

How do we see ourselves authentically as African and alive with possibilities?

nicpaton's picture

OK tell us more, Dr.

Dr Veysie, tell us more about your proposal. What exactly is it called? Spill the beans...

Peter Veysie's picture

Heh not so fast on the doctor!!

I am engaged in a search for a bridge between the church of today and the world of tomorrow in an African urban context. What will we need to build in order to move into the future ? My supervisors are Len Sweet and Chris Peppler and the emergent,emerging and postmodern conversation is really what it's all about. We have loads of research that has and is being done in the States,Europe and Australia as well as New Zealand, but not a lot in our African context. So would love to scan your brains for thoughts on this. Interesting results on the poll by the way.

Steve Hayes's picture

Doctoral thesis

It would be interesting to know more about your thesis question -- perhaps if we have a synchroblog you will find it helpful, at least in refining the question.

Peter Veysie's picture

The question is....

I would say that the question is - How do we bridge the gap between the church of today and the world of tomorrow in an African urban context ?

nicpaton's picture

OI - WHO STOLE THE VOTING BOOTH?

Mr Saner, please replace the poll. I know you have hidden it. And deconstructed it. And probably corrupted it to with what YOU want to hear.

Roger Saner's picture

Voting booth back!

Sorry guy - turns out when I created it, I didn't tick the "public" box on the "audience" bit - something you'll need to do when you create future polls :)

Andries Louw's picture

Are you engaging MES and PCM?

Peter, sounds fascinating. Are you engaging the people at MES in Hillbrow and PCM (Pretoria Community Ministries)? I assume you know them. And Ray Bakke from Chicago? When I was studying at Tuks our mission week theme in 1991 was Save-a-city with an emphasis on urban ministry. Dr Ray Bakke was our main speaker and he really opened our eyes for the unique needs of inner cities. Stephan de Beer did an internship with him in Chicago in '92 and then returned to start PCM in '93.

Peter Veysie's picture

Good to know

I was going to register at Bakke - all in it would have been hugely expensive, so I am with SATS right now. I will be in touch with PCM. I facilitate a group called "Change Agents", which is training the youth leaders of the future, and lead a church in rivonia which is very aligned with an ermergent mindset. we are called Ridgeway.

Please comment on blog

I would very much welcome more comment on the blog.

http://emergingthreat.blogspot.com/

Have tried to respond to all the comments so far.

Most commented post was:
http://emergingthreat.blogspot.com/2008/10/quotes-from-emerging-church.html

Philip Rosenthal

Post new comment

Please solve the math problem above and type in the result. e.g. for 1+1, type 2.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <em> <b> <img> <i>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options