Amaharo and ABiblical

Stray's picture

I've pasted this from my blog as I thought it could create some interesting conversation here.

I've started (at last) listening to the audio of the Amaharo conference.

Roger Saner has very kindly put up the recordings of the event here

The talks I've listened to so far are:

Edward Simiyu - The ministry of presence
Kelly Nikondeha - The Amahoro story
Postcolonialism and why it matters - Dr Kenzo Mabiala
The African Reformation - Brian McLaren

Once I get some more bandwidth I'll download and listen to some more.

Alright, now what did I think? Feel? Both?

Actually, both are a good way to explain what the talks have so far meant to me.

Mabiala's talk about postcolonialism was quite fascinating. This is because it began to unravel and reveal the colonial thinking in my own head, particularly in areas of which types of thinking are 'biblical' and which are not.

Example? Well, Mabiala made some references to TIME. For the African, the watch is not something that comes from their culture. The African gets up when he gets up, goes to work when he goes to work, etc.

Now I've begun to realise how my own colonial mindset sits in judgement over this thinking. A concept of time such as this is far less 'efficient' than the Western concept of time, in my thinking.

From a background perspective, I know that Africans tend to view time in the form of "now - backwards" whereas Westerns view time more of "now - forwards". This has led to Westerners being more interested in progress, while Africans more interested in the past (ancestors, etc.).

Ancestral worship aside, the very concept of time from the African was not only viewed as 'inefficient' for me (and one could discuss what 'efficiency' really means anyway, which I'll probably reserve for a future post) but also as 'unbiblical'.

But is it unbiblical or just... different? Or, is it not that bringing in both concepts of time, forming something together will show us something truly biblical? Is that the answer? A form of pluralism?

Or, even more so, perhaps the concept of time has nothing to do with the Bible whatsoever? In other words, it's ABIBLICAL.

What does the Bible say about progress and efficiency? The BIBLE, not my own protestant work ethic or Western tradition?

Seems to me the Bible has a few things to say about work. It implores us not to be lazy, to work with our hands, to be diligent in our work and to watch our herds carefully. It also reminds us that wealth is seasonal, or that we should work with seasons in mind. But it doesn't say anything about what the RIGHT philosophy of time is, it simply says that as long as we stick to these basic guidelines we're ok.

What's my point? My point is that rather than putting everything into a category of "biblical" or "unbiblical", which is how I've always measured things (or thought I was), there is now a third category opening up to me - "ABiblical". Something that is neither WRONG or RIGHT, but simply dependant on either my taste or what is necessary for the culture I find myself in.

For instance, when I am in Africa I must do as the Africans do. If I throw my watch away and live as the Africans do am I doing something wrong? Unbiblical? Or am I just taking on another culture, or parts of another worldview, for a time so that I may reach those in this culture and worldview with the Gospel?

See, there are certain things I may feel I must 'teach' Africa as an educated person, and that these are 'biblical' concepts. Some examples are: We must be on time, we must work from 8 to 5, we must wear respectable clothing, we must do this and that. And so Africa seems like this huge challenge because 'basic things' of 'life' and the 'gospel' need to be taught.

But are these not rather ABiblical things that, even myself, who is not racist and loves cultures, somehow at the back of his mind still judges his 'culture' as 'more right' than another? Is it about one culture being better than another, or is it about forming a colourful culture together, with one Head and King, Jesus?

For one, as a white guy, the talks so far have made me understand the African better and also see my own ignorant colonial thinking.

Last night my wife and I watched a bit of Sting's "All This Time" DVD. I've always loved world music, and I felt God really speak to me last night, while enjoying this spectrum of music and musicians from all parts of the world. It's time to break loose of the pressures of my own culture and greco-roman, even stoic thinking, that has for too long disguised itself as 'biblical' when it is nothing of the sort (or, rather, some of it is just abiblical) and be free from concepts such as what 'success' really is, what 'efficiency' really is, and what Biblical really is, what Kingdom really is, amongst others.

This frees one up to preach the GOSPEL, not their own culture's view of the gospel, or their own culture as the Gospel. While I never for once thought I was doing that, it seems that I have been doing that without even realising it. After all, Paul in the Scriptures said "I have become all things to all men so that I might save some."

You can also read and comment on this at my blog if you like.

Comments

Andries Louw's picture

Becoming aware of your own paradigms

Ryan, becoming aware of your own paradigms is perhaps the single most important thing you can do as a "Westerner". You are right that many things Westerners assume to be Biblical are in fact cultural and that lies at the heart of the problem with colonialism. Many well-meaning Europeans tried to enforce a European world view on Africa, thinking that it was Biblical. Unfortunately many are still doing it, often without realising that they're doing it.

Like so many other things, the issue of becoming aware of your own paradigms is a journey that can take you on some interesting twists and turns. The best and most honest book I've read on the clashing of the European and African world views is Saam in Afrika by Attie van Niekerk (1992: Tafelberg), translated in English as One Destiny.

Borrowing an African expression "When two bulls are fighting the grass suffers", he says that the African and European world views are like two elephant bulls fighting, particularly in South Africa and that it creates a lot of misunderstandings and pain in the process.

He doesn't actually offer solutions in the book but raises a lot of questions and shakes your thinking, providing a few clues on the way forward in this journey.

In my opinion one of the greatest dangers in this journey is that, as "Westerners" we might think very quickly that "we have figured out the African". Then we go back to our drawing board, re-write our theory of how Africa works and then try to control Africa in a slightly different way.

Best wishes on your journey!

Andries Louw
http://nextchurch.wordpress.com

nicpaton's picture

awareness

Andries - well put. I very much agree that"becoming aware of your own paradigms is perhaps the single most important thing you can do".

Stray's picture

I loved that

Thanks Andries. Becoming aware of our own paradigms - I really spent some time in thinking on that one.

It was well put. I even mentioned it, and this subject, in a newspaper article I've put forward... I'll let you know if they publish it.

www.ryanpeterwrites.com
"The Glory of God is man fully alive" - St Iraneaus

Steve Hayes's picture

Time and other things

A book that helped me to become aware of these things was The primal vision by J.V. Taylor. It was subtitled "Christian presence amid African religion", and was part of a series -- another was Sandals at the mosque. But none of the others were as good as The primal vision.

Taylor made the point that Westerners presented Christianity as a classroom religion, something to put on with school clothes, and take off when you got home from school, with linear thought patterns.

Stray's picture

recommendation

Thanks for the recommendation Steve ;)

www.ryanpeterwrites.com
"The Glory of God is man fully alive" - St Iraneaus

nicpaton's picture

From state to quest.

Thanks so much for the feedback and taking time to absorb what Amahoro was about.

The fact that you posted 17 "?"'s means you have made a transition from "state"/ments "quest"/ions.

I thought you, as "relationalist", would enjoy the Edwards "ministry of presence" - did you? For me his pithy little talk was far more powerful than the intellectual prowess of Mabiala. But I am thrilled so many people are getting things out of Kenzo, because we need intellectuals to help us get out of our evangelical stuckness.

Stray's picture

Totally

Yeah, was going to mention it in a future post. Edwards' little talk on the Ministry of Presence was awesome. Just over six minutes and it said so much to me. Made me much more aware of how I approach ministry-- just being there is as important as what you say... it was great!

www.ryanpeterwrites.com
"The Glory of God is man fully alive" - St Iraneaus

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <em> <b> <img> <i>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options